Two sessions of Handbuilt Pottery classes are now over, and I think I am starting to learn to speak clay.
And isn't it interesting that it should occur to me to say it that way? I can write and speak with at least reasonable fluency in two languages, with fair fluency in another two, and at least smatterings of three more. Language is my home turf. It has always flowed easily for me and been a source of delight.
Working with clay, not so much. I enjoy it greatly, and I've been drawn to it for a long time, but that easy fluency isn't really there. Or maybe it's just that working with clay is such a different language family, compared to the Indo-European and Semitic families I have at least a nodding acquaintance with, that I am back to a baby's pace in learning this one.
[Pause while she savors the memory of her baby granddaughter's gurgles and squeaks in the background of phone conversations with her son.]
First there's just crying, then a whole repertoire of different kinds of crying. Then there are sounds deliberately made that are not crying. These go on for a long time and become quite varied before anything resembling a syllable emerges. And the syllables, in turn, become quite varied, and gradually assume the rhythms and melodies of the language the baby hears, while still remaining nonsense babbling.
Eventually, meaningful syllables, then words, then grammar and syntax emerge. Then you get your six year old grandson explaining his Magformers creations by saying, "The mating season is over, and now the pterosaurs have to defend the eggs from predators." (The kid watches a lot of nature specials on TV.)
[Parenthetical note: If you have kids on your gift list, get them Magformers. Heck, get some for yourself. Phenomenal toy.]
But do you ever finish learning to speak language? I don't think so. We can and do reach a state of effortless fluency, but there are always new words to learn or invent, new observations or insights to express, that keep stretching the limits of our language skills.
But back to clay. I think maybe these two sessions of classes have taken me through the repertoire of crying and varied non-crying sounds stages, with maybe some syllables and an occasional flash of fluent babbling emerging. I won't claim more.
So here are some of my gurglings and babblings in clay, and some of what I learned in making them.
The little green vase (or planter or whatever) is the very first piece I made. It was a class assignment to make a slab-built vessel with curved sides, plus encouragement to experiment with textured surfaces. I added feet, because I like footed things. It was just a whim. I still like how it came out. The slight texture was from a texture block borrowed from the teacher.
The lidded jar came not long after. Actually, the lid came first, when I had been experimenting with coil-built vessels and had some leftover coils. The teacher suggested weaving them, then commented that they would make a good jar lid. So I added the outside rim to the lid, and piece on the underside to prevent slipping. Then I had to make a jar to go with the lid, so I used my slab-building skills for that. The idea for the decoration was mine, combining a stamped small flower and freehand grass stems. My teacher clearly wanted me to glaze the piece, but something in me resisted--I didn't want to lose the texture of the design. So I wiped it with red iron oxide and left it unglazed. I was happy with the result.
And here we have three coil-built pieces, from which I learned that it is very easy to make bad-to-average coiled pieces, and very very hard to make good ones. 'Nuff said.
Several people in the class were making very practical pieces like bread trays and dishes with very regular designs, so I thought I should at least try that approach.
The piece on the right in the picture above is the result: very regular and rectangular, with a very regular, symmetrical design pressed in. It's fine, but I'm not particularly excited about it. The one on the left, though, I like much better. I made it later, during the second session of classes, when I was becoming a bit more confident in my own style. Instead of cutting a neat rectangle, I just left the clay edges in the shape they had upon emerging from the slab roller. The textures I made with a jar lid opener, a texture roller, and a piece of seashell that was deeply eaten away by marine worms. I actually like this piece a lot. I wish the glaze color came out better in the picture. From these two I learned that I like irregular, abstract looking textures and shapes better than ones where it looks like I have completely imposed my will on the clay.
In between making the two dishes seen above, I did some experimenting with deliberately cutting designs into the clay, rather than just impressing textures into it. Here are two examples.
I was very excited about these two pieces while I was working with the
clay, drawing the trunks and roots and branches freehand, using a small
scallop shell for the ground texture, and using the wormy shell for the
leaves. But once they got glazed, I was underwhelmed with the result.
More experimentation, maybe with added layers, is needed.
I have discovered that I am resistant to scrapping leftover clay. As with the leftover coils that became a jar lid, I try to find ways to use my scraps.
These soap dishes result from that impulse. I didn't think out the design ahead of time. I was just fiddling with some leftover rolled-out clay, trying to make it interesting, and realized that the resulting shape would work as a soap dish that would hold a bar of soap upright, so it wouldn't get all soft and squishy. I added feet, of course--I do like feet!--and in the first series, represented by the brown one on the left, I tried punching holes for water to drain. I discovered that the glaze would fill in the holes, so in the second series, represented by the one with the sort of octopus design on the right, I just made designs.
I even like using other people's leftovers. This piece was made from a leftover bit of extruded clay that a classmate shared when she put more clay into the extruder than she really needed.
To me it has a kind of 1930s feel to it, an era whose design I have always loved. I'm particularly happy with how the glaze worked out on it--I'm nowhere near as far along in learning the language of glaze as I am in learning the language of clay.
And finally, I did some experimenting with making pinch pots, again discovering that it's easy to make bad ones, hard to make good ones. This is the only one I've made so far that I really like.
Like all human beings, I love the feeling of competence, of mastery. But this adventure in working with clay has given me a chance to revel in the delights of being a beginner, even now late in my seventh decade. It's wonderfully refreshing. I recommend it.